transaction costs are part of other management effects already.
trading costs are outside. It is the Total Portfolio Return - Sum(All other effects) plug number - as L3Crucifier says. It is the impact of Sales / Purchases on Total Portfolio Return.
but the two are different. In the table presented in the book Transaction Costs are 0, but Trading Costs for the two managers are different.
So that is just a filler? Im asking becasue i dont want to get poked in the eye by some comparative question where one manager made his money on 'trading activity"