“Ask anybody if this feels like 1% and they’ll tell you, they’ll say ‘This is really great. At least 6%, probably higher.’ I’ve had SO MANY PEOPLE call me and say “Thank you.” Low energy, weak economists used to say 1%. Now, you look, they say ‘You know, Trump really had a point. It is at way more.’ The people that are friends of mine called and said ‘Donald, you have done us a tremendous service. We had a real problem and we have to get to the root. We have to ban China.’ And, you know, they’re right! China is a huge problem, it’s a big deal!”
.
Let’s rebel against evil, and vote for Trump! 
BTW, I was meaning to post this months ago…
BChad, Ohai, and StL keep talking this nationalistic-bias bullshit about how when the market goes down, expensive DM will go down less than select cheap EM. Of course you fools never actually follow thru and observe results, you know test your theory. I religiously test my theories, and learn.
During the Brexit shock China (CSI300) was the best thing going…which is exactly what I’ve been calling for years. Multiple drivers of that, 1) China equities have one of the lowest correlations in the world, 2) large-caps are already cheap so less distance to fall, 3) government protected floor and ability to enforce that protection. But you guys won’t learn, you’ll forgot all this, and post the same textbook crap a month from now…and end up wrong again.
_ While by noon in Hong Kong most markets that were trading showed losses ranging from 3 percent to 6 percent on Brexit, the Shanghai-Shenzhen CSI 300 was down about 1 percent, outperforming everything else that is considered a risky asset. _
https://www.bloomberg.com/gadfly/articles/2016-06-24/sheltering-from-brexit-try-china
Back on topic…
That’s not what I said and that’s barely even a sentence. At this point, I’m just concerned about you. I mean, you’re so stupid it’s like your Down’s Syndrome is retarded.
^ You didn’t even artfully weasel out of being wrong, such transparent ad hominem.
Yeah, Hillary should.
I would love to have a battle of wits with you, but you appear to be completely unarmed.
Wow!
I didn’t know that you were even _ aware _ of Oscar Wilde!
(Or Abby Buchanan Longstreet, if you please.)
I’m fine with a battle of investment calls , which I am winning. 
He’s a very quotable person. Don’t particularly like his writing though. Got the impression he really liked the sound of his own voice (or words, if you will).
Trump should do this
Mark Cuban:
.1) @realDonaldTrump $10mm to the charity of YOUR choice if you let ME interview you for 4 hrs on YOUR policies and their substance.
9:19 AM - 16 Sep 2016
44K RETWEETS70.6K LIKES
I don’t understand why Cuban is spending so much time and wants to spend so much money going after Trump. It’s been months now. He’s a smart guy. He must of noticed that Trump is made of teflon. There’s nothing he can do in that 4 hour interview that will change that.
^ kind of curious as to Cubans intentions, he clearly isnt an idiot and being played by Trump. Maybe he just enjoys being part of the national dialog, he has never really been one to hold his opinion. Also, whats 10mm to him? If he managed to take down Trump he would become a legend.
^ But it’s impossible to take down Trump in an interview or a debate because he never answers the questions directly. He goes on a 5 minute rant combining half truths and appealing to the emotions of people and then the audience forgets the original question. He is a master at that.
Interviewer: Give me a specific example on how you will eliminate ISIS?
Trump: We have to make America great again. No one has any respect for our President. It’s ridiculous how no one respects America anymore. We have to be strong like General Marshall was. He was a true American hero. He was huuuuuge for the country. I’m the only man that can make us great again. Bla bla bla for another 5 minutes.
Please explain. He sold some random startup for zillions just at the right time, which is his only claim to fame.
My comment is based on his insight on Shark Tank.
Don’t you have to be smart to do this?