VAR presentation in schweser

On the sweser mock they have this question

“Using the variance/covariance method, the 1-year value at risk in the Ambassador Fund with 97.5% probability is closest to:”

Then they say,

“With a 97.5% probability, the lower bound on the distribution is the mean less two standard deviations which equals 10% − 2(10%) = −10%. On a $100 million investment, therefore, the VAR using the variance/covariance method is $100 million times 10% or $10 million.”

This is wrong, right? Or at least, not in line with the CFA textbooks.

What they are solving for is VAR with a 2.5% probability.

97.5% var would be the mean PLUS two standard deviations.

But remember VAR is always 1 sided…

97.5% var is 1.96

95% = 1.65, 99% = 2.33

I know, I am qouting schweser, they round 1.96 to 2.

My question is that when they say they “the 1-year value at risk in the Ambassador Fund with 97.5% probability” are they wrong?