Hi guys,
What is your estimate of the breadth ?
In other words, do you believe that said previous exams are a good preparation for the actual AM in 4 days ?
Hi guys,
What is your estimate of the breadth ?
In other words, do you believe that said previous exams are a good preparation for the actual AM in 4 days ?
it’s always 50% in the morning an 50% in the afternoon
Txs but that it not what I meant.
What I want to know is how much of each topic was tested between 2010 and 2014.
So for example, it could be that most Economics material was tested. Therefore, say, 80 % of economics was tested.
But then it could be that SWAPS were hardly tested at all. Therefore Derivatives has, say, only 20 % of its testable material that was tested.
See what I mean ?
You shouldn’t think of it that way. Anything is the text is fair game.
Just use the stated weights per focus area as your primary guide…
Dude, sorry but I have to disrespectfully disagree with that statement.
I might be wrong, but I think that this is a myth.
If the last 5 years AM papers are any guide, the same topics cover like 60 % of any given section consistently.
Sure, anything can pop up on an exam, but the 70 % core is way more important than the rest, IMO.
Again, this is not indication what to expect in 2015 AM exam…
I agree but what I mean to say is that within,say, economics, the questions tend to repeat themselves. Same for rebalancing, etc.
What is a good, short answer to number 4?