Ha, she texted back, sometime last night, but didnt see it until today as didnt have my phone with me. Said she’ll be away working for the few weeks but will probably stay there a bit longer, “but would not mind to catch up later if you dont change your mind”. Whats my play here, laos bear in mind I am very late in responding, as I said had left my phone at work over night…
You idiot! I could see you were getting all bunched up over nothing. Respond along these lines - I am definitely catching up with you - can hardly think of anything else!! 
I already replied. Said something like well let me know when you’re around again etc. I’m just gonna stop overthinking things. The fact a cute 21yo girl wanted to make out with me is what it is, and good for the ego, and I should use it for my confidence now that Im back on the single scene. If something more stems from it (ie wild baboon like sex) so be it.
“well let me know when you’re around again” Fail
Dude_CFA Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > “well let me know when you’re around again” > > Fail I’ve been working on removing words like so, just, really, well (except when I did something) and any other useless stuff from my vocab. Try it out, people will think you’re chuck norris. “Let me know when you’re around again” - Authority “Well, let me know when you’re around again” - I’ll be waiting
No, the message is wrong in the first place. He should have been authoratative full stop. What he wrote is just flim flam fluff talk - what you might say to a nobody-in-particular you missed on a visit, not someone you want to exchange body fluids with. No wonder he struggles. Take control.
Ok i just rechecked the message. I used “just”. Maybe a bit better than “Well”. And I think we are reading into this stuff too much. just let me know when you’re around again. But I like the chuck norris take control statement. Will employ that method in future use. Its all learning for me, until I become a super-pimp
The woman wants attention. If she doesn’t get it from you, she’ll look elsewhere. You really have a binary decision. You can try to look uninterested and hope she will chase after you, or you go full on with the decision to say “I’m really so into you and I really want to see you, let’s get together X and do Y.” Middle of the ground texts like “yeah, it’d be nice to do something sometime if you’re around and the weather isn’t too annoying” are a definite blah. The woman is wanting attention. Personally, at this point, I think giving her the attention is more likely to work (though by no means guaranteed). If you’re actually into her, then go ahead and say it. You might think that your pride is at stake, but if it doesn’t work, then just go lick your wounds and realize that men all over the world have to do the same thing all the time. Far better to say “well, I told her I was into her, and she just wasn’t into me” than to spend your time wondering “maybe I should have called/tried harder/said something.” The real key to women’s hearts - I’ve taken far to long to learn - is how you talk to them, and (if you’re in their presence) how you look at them when you are talking. This is why texting is such a godsend to young men (and by extension, women), because you actually have time to think about what to say.
transferpricingCFA Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Ok i just rechecked the message. > > I used “just”. Maybe a bit better than “Well”. And > I think we are reading into this stuff too much. > > just let me know when you’re around again. > > But I like the chuck norris take control > statement. Will employ that method in future use. > Its all learning for me, until I become a > super-pimp for how long have you been single ? coz your technic looks too much as the one of a young teenager still struggling with how to handle little teenager girls. That’s what usually happens to people who were in a relationship from 18Y old and break up just at their late 20’…hard to come back
Dude_CFA Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > No, the message is wrong in the first place. He > should have been authoratative full stop. What he > wrote is just flim flam fluff talk - what you > might say to a nobody-in-particular you missed on > a visit, not someone you want to exchange body > fluids with. No wonder he struggles. Take control. Full stop is the best phrase ever.
Miss*Yiota Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > transferpricingCFA Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Ok i just rechecked the message. > > > > I used “just”. Maybe a bit better than “Well”. > And > > I think we are reading into this stuff too > much. > > > > just let me know when you’re around again. > > > > But I like the chuck norris take control > > statement. Will employ that method in future > use. > > Its all learning for me, until I become a > > super-pimp > > > for how long have you been single ? coz your > technic looks too much as the one of a young > teenager still struggling with how to handle > little teenager girls. That’s what usually happens > to people who were in a relationship from 18Y old > and break up just at their late 20’…hard to come > back Been single for a bit over a month. But first weeks to a month didnt really feel like crushing box, so wasnt out there. Prior to that been in a relationship for 5 years
Reading these posts makes me think that I should expand my offering of career advisory services beyond mock interviews and resume reviews. Seems like there is a much larger market opportunity for how to send text messages to girls without overanalyzing everything.
Cyrano de Numiac?
Numi do you really give career advice or is this a troll?
The texting / dating advice is clearly a troll, but I do have a career advisory practice serving 250+ clients globally
bchadwick Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Cyrano de Numiac? Just saw this. LOL
numi Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The texting / dating advice is clearly a troll, > but I do have a career advisory practice serving > 250+ clients globally 250 globally ? that means around 1.7 per country ? loool… how do you manage the specifity of each country?
I don’t know what a “specifity” is, and if I did I’m not sure I would manage it (?). “Globally” just means I have clients in countries other than the one where I’m domiciled, i.e. the United States. So, as I try to understand your question, then I guess you could say I have on average 1.7 clients in China, 1.7 clients in Azerbaijan and another 1.7 clients in Equatorial Guinea.
for god’s sake stop with the texting and CALL her.
how is this convo still going on?