Now that the above fact has sunk in. Is this too young? When do you think people are prepared for that step? I know I’m more on the nerdy end of things, but I thought HS was still young.
Father of a young daughter and younger son here. Boys are good to go at 12 (even younger if she’s a smoking hot teacher) and girls are good to go when I’m dead.
I would start to question your son’s sexuality at that point.
Honestly though, at 8 years old or even 12, how many males have gone through puberity? Probably not that many unless you are one of those early bloomers.
^I might agree with you at 8. But I was in 7th grade when I was 12. I had to make it a point to hide boners every time I got the privelige of looking down another 12 year old girl’s shirt. I could have definitely lasted a whole six seconds with an NFL cheerleader.
Now that I think about it–I’m 33. I bet I would still last six seconds with an NFL cheerleader.
I was 19. Chris Brown got an 11 year start on me. I’m cool. I’m definitely a late bloomer though, I just got the ability to grow a beard. I was thinking maybe junior year of HS would be a good age as a rule of thumb.
TV Scene with the guys with kids on this forum:
Father turns to son, “Hey buddy, you’re 12 now, go out there and prick all those sl*ts in your grade.” Father turns to daughter and gives evil stare so she runs back in her room and hides under the bed.
Data seems to support (or at least not refute) the “hot teacher” hypothesis. Consider that 14-year-old boys are about twice as likely to have have had sex compared to 14-year-old girls. Either these 14-year-old boys are doing it with older women, or the same 14-year-old girls are doing 2 guys on average.
I would say: same girl doing multiple guys. If a girl is already sex active at age 14, I highly doubt she’s in the mindset of love and devotion to 1 guy.
Is it possible (however unlikely) that teen boys are more likely to lie and say that they HAVE had sex, and that teen girls are more likely to lie and say that they have NOT had sex?