apparently not all of us got the same AM exam (or PM exam), and the key was the 4-digit number in the right upper corner (e.g. 7171 vs 8181). Which may or may not be how ChickenTikka could breeze through the AM while the rest of us struggled. (I have no clude where Greenman actually went for the exam. His AM was good so maybe he is the outlier if he was in US.)
I jus want to know if this was an East vs West thing? Like all USAns got 7171 but all Australians and HKers got 8181?
7000’s in London. Thought AM was pretty straight forward though. Only problem was time management. There was nothing in there that wasn’t in the CFAI material or Schweser I thought. Fair but tough.
Looks like people who got 8x8x breezed through the AM but found PM full of weird questions; while people who got 7x7x found AM brutal and PM a cakewalk.
8080 and found AM not actually tough. Well I didnt know some topic areas is my problem and not CFAI problem. Yes there was a slight time constraint. PM was ok, except for some really weird questions… I finished PM in something like 1 hour 55 mins or something and came out with 1 hour to spare as I dont relook at answers I have chosen first.
PM one topic area where I get consistently less than 50 from Level 1 and 2 pained me again in 3 I wasnt surprised at all and I dont like that topic a bit. Again my problem and not CFAI problem.
So overall I wouldnt blaim the paper at all, if anything its the way I prepared. But a little pained by the fact that the topic areas which we all thought as heavy weight and important never made it to the exam… So feel a bit bad about it…
since the cfa institute believes in standardization…it does not appear to be logical room cfas point of view to have two diff set of papers…i feel it wud be the same