Part of me feels where your’e coming from, still in a good “groove” and want to remain productive. But then the other part of me looks at the past few year of dedication and the upcoming summer and I want to say screw it. Plus unless my company is changing back to their old policy of covering for the mba, not interested for now…
The fact that GMAT is just one data point in your application is true, but that doesn’t make my statement false.
If you’re a white/chinese/indian male with a 760 GMAT, that doesn’t mean that you’re automatically going to be admitted to a top U.S. MBA. Tens of thousands of such folks get rejected from these schools every year.
A mediocre undergraduate transcript, essay, interview, letter of recommendation, etc can also get you dinged.
Can you find examples of white/chinese/indian males with <700 GMATs at these top schools? Maybe a few, but they’re not regular-joe applicants – they have some kind of really remarkable background.
However, if you’re a white/indian/chinese male that wants to attend a top U.S. school, you’ll need to score in the 99th percentile (760+).
I do know plenty of white/indian/chinese males that went to HBS/Wharton/Stanford that did NOT score 760+, so IMHO, your statement is false. You switched your argument from 760+ to <700 - that’s a different story. I do believe you need to get over 700, but not 760+.
I think we can agree that there’s not a single exact cutoff for GMAT; there are other factors that weigh in too.
But if you’re the typical (eg. unremarkable engineering etc background) white/indian/chinese male applicant and you think you’re going to get into a top U.S. school with a 710-720 GMAT, you are dreaming.
Lowly bio major who was doing finance. Read my other post - even lowly engineers can get into the best schools with 700ish GMAT scores. I would argue the GMAT is likley the least important data point assuming you get over 700.