And I once worked for a . . . um . . . gentleman who had a PhD in physics who didn’t understand the implications of a simple, linear equation. In one variable.
Doesn’t surprise me, I’ve seen similar examples. Qualifications knowledge is usually soon to fade away, we must continuously work on our skills and abilities and not just depend on a few letters after our name that make us look smart.
I always took what people perceive to be Marks ego as just a no nonsense kinda thing magnified by his tonedeaf straightforwardness.
You’d see a ton of candidates in the comments under his videos that would ask questions that could have been found if they spent an extra five seconds referring to the reading or without detailing what parts were confusing and why, and expect him to just re explain what was in the video and he is not afraid to clap back at them for the perceived laziness. Not sure if I would call that ego but I get why people dont find him the most friendly. He clearly puts a lot of work into his videos and it probably annoys him when the candidates don’t put proportional amount of work into their questions.
I remember several months ago, MM made a post on linkedin. I dont follow him or anything but I was browsing around. MM asked for an attorney recommendation in India to pursue a copyright issue. He said he was after blood and wanted a ruthless attorney. (something in those lines, just from recall)
For what it’s worth, I used the MM mocks for level 2. Most questions were written by Bill Campbell III. A lot of good questions, but also frustrating errata was required.
In one of his videos, MM said that he had found some copyright violators, looked them up on LinkedIn and was going to inform their employers so that the violators lose their jobs.