Person of the year or Man of the year?

Brah, he already won. We got that.

I am curious as to what is the ‘calculated’ part of the equation in his conduct of American geo-politics via Social Media or his refusal to take briefings daily. After reading his book, I am sure you have the best words to break it down for some of us luddites.

So the person who wrote the book you enjoyed isnt allowed to have an opinion on his subject? I always enjoy hearing about what a person doing a biopic/article/book thinks about the subject before and after doing the story, the way opinions on an individual change through interaction is pretty interesting

Love how some liberals are pressing tolerance, anti-shaming and anti-bullying but will be the first to look for every reason to bash a man’s hair, skin, appearance, wife, kids, ect ect if they don’t agree with him. Also, can’t forget the safe spaces.

Hitler and Stalin both got it before the world knew they were genocidal maniacs though.

Yeah, thirty years later during an election. No previous article on the subject. I’m sure his comments weren’t politically motivated. Odds are he was paid by the New Yorker, or somebody else, no?

^ ooooor no one would care about his opinion on the subject until now?

.

How would you handicap me or anybody else refusing timely top secret information? Think about it. Information is power, no?..You’re so far behind. Better find some real news.

Its possible he just never felt the need to come public with them because DT wields power and could have caused problems for him. When DT ran for president it suddenly became a story. I would imagine many people who may not have a glowing opinion of you come out of the woodwork if you were to run for president, repubs brought out an endless line of them for HRC, including Barack Obamas brother

Its not a conspiracy, its just the way things work. No one would care about his opinion of Trump 10 years ago because no one cares about Trump 10 years ago. Now people care about Trump, and his opinion is suddenly relevant.

Start addressing the content rather than attacking the messenger bruv. A lot of what he says viz-a-viz Trump’s personality tallies on many levels with what we have seen especially his pathological narcissism and he isn’t the first person to come out with this assessment. Of course they could all be shills paid for by the evil leftists intent on destroying 'Murica but If there are any calculated moves related to his tweets that I am somehow missing it would be great to hear them.

Ok, I read this thrice and I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. Can you or someone else please explain?

Donald Trump has been a media fascination for fifty years.

The biographer probably gave that interview because the newspaper actively sought him out, not because he suddenly felt the compelling urge to get his opinion into the open after 30 years.

As your boy Trump would say: “Wrong!”

https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=donald%20trump

But it is also true that Trump’s candidacy gave new relevance to the author’s knowledge and opinion that wasn’t there before.

Before, it was mostly a matter of curiosity into the life of a bigly citizen and pop entertainer. Afterwards, the information is relevant to the future lives of the 300+ million people in the USA and millions more abroad.

This guy always seems bright. He probably also knows that operatives not only seek people out to say stuff, they offer compensation. Political parties also exposed their playbooks…Don’t be a mark.

If I have to explain why that supports my case, this might be a little above your pay grade. I don’t think you’re familiar with the Trump life story and his significance to NYC.

Sorry man, you’re clearly blinded by your infatuation with the Donald. Is there a chance that every single woman who accused Trump of sexual harassment, every single person who said anything bad about Trump, and every person who farted in Trump’s direction were all paid to do so by the Clinton machine? Sure, it’s possible. But it’s not likely.

Yeah, billionaires aren’t targets for lawsuits. Nothing there for the plaintiff. Waste of their time. The upstanding women only come out of the woodwork if they run for president.

You going to ever address the content or keep circle-jerking your original post?

Why don’t you enlighten us?