^ wow, i was about to write that i supported you, MattLikesAnalysis. if you read a bit more (using analysis) into Mobius Striptease’s comment, it was his reference to my jesting with him about his mom (which is my “level”), not necessary lack of insight, accusation, reverse, low IQ, or reverse racism. anyways, go ahead and call people idiots MattLikesAnalysis and keep thinking you are somehow better than iheariheartmath, at least he’s having a ball with this thread and is hilarious.
from now on, i will refer to MattLikesAnalysis as MattLikesHitler. iheartiheartmath, any other things you have to say to MattLikesHitler? I’m loving your pwning of him.
iheartiheartmath Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > -mattlikesanalysis considers Hitler to be the > definition of success and is quickly subjected to > the most epic can of @sswhoopin’ ever seen on this > forum iheartiheartmath pwns MattLikesHitler
all that said, i do greatly appreciate numi’s posts in general and insight based on his background in private equity specifically.
needhelp Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > We need someone to come in here and threaten to > report this forum to CFAI, so we can all bond once > again. If I remember correctly Aliman has Tranniemadrid on his facebook. “She” may be an ideal candidate to take a new name, return, and liven up the forum until becoming banned once again. Can you inform “her” Aliman?
sublimity Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > from now on, i will refer to MattLikesAnalysis as > MattLikesHitler. > > iheartiheartmath, any other things you have to say > to MattLikesHitler? I’m loving your pwning of > him. +1, although you just stole the thunder of my next screenname.
sublimity Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > ^ wow, i was about to write that i supported you, > MattLikesAnalysis. > > if you read a bit more (using analysis) into > Mobius Striptease’s comment, it was his reference > to my jesting with him about his mom (which is my > “level”), not necessary lack of insight, > accusation, reverse, low IQ, or reverse racism. > > anyways, go ahead and call people idiots > MattLikesAnalysis and keep thinking you are > somehow better than iheariheartmath, at least he’s > having a ball with this thread and is hilarious. seriously. if you read closer, i didn’t call you any name ever. i stated that me saying several posters were idiots was your level, i.e. playful namecalling/mombashing. IHIHM took full brunt of the lack of insight, accusation, low IQ, and reverse racism comment.
MattLikesAnalysis- perhaps if you had instead used Pablo Escobar in your analogy of how someone may rise to great power and riches yet not be considered successful by any decent human being you may have had more ppl actually ready and understand what you were trying to convey… $$ does not = success …do note that inferring that iheartiheartmath’s love of money likened him to hitler was unnecessary though- so you were provoking this reaction to a point.
akanska Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > MattLikesAnalysis- > > perhaps if you had instead used Pablo Escobar in > your analogy of how someone may rise to great > power and riches yet not be considered successful > by any decent human being you may have had more > ppl actually ready and understand what you were > trying to convey… > > $$ does not = success cocaine was legal at one time and not everyone sees it as bad. we legally ingest cocaine derivatives every day. first degree murder has never been legal.
actually to clarify my point, all i was trying to do is to insert the words “sublimity” and “mom” in one paragraph, then sit back and let the thread loose
MattLikesAnalysis Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > akanska Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > MattLikesAnalysis- > > > > perhaps if you had instead used Pablo Escobar > in > > your analogy of how someone may rise to great > > power and riches yet not be considered > successful > > by any decent human being you may have had more > > ppl actually ready and understand what you were > > trying to convey… > > > > $$ does not = success > > > cocaine was legal at one time and not everyone > sees it as bad. we legally ingest cocaine > derivatives every day. first degree murder has > never been legal. ummm- so escobar never killed anyone?? I lived in medellin. think about it. of course you example was more extreme- but so much so that it puts everyone in a state of mind that is not conducive to reading comprehension. and if you want to be REALLY extreme… killing all sorts of classes of people was legal at some point in history, as were slavery, and all sorts of other horrendous acts. (…there goes me trying to defend your argument ever again)
+1 to akanska, and I didn’t think MattLikesHitlerandCocaine could stick his foot any deeper in his mouth, but apparently I was wrong…
I agree with sublimity that the entertainment value of AF is awesome at times. Other times we suck.
Mobius Striptease Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > actually to clarify my point, all i was trying to > do is to insert the words “sublimity” and “mom” in > one paragraph, then sit back and let the thread > loose lol, “loose” and “insert” are usually used in a sentence with your mom. (o:`,
i dont think this is the first time sublimity’s mom has been brought up now, just who is this magical woman
Hitler: -was primarily obsessed with aggregating power and realizing his future vision of a singular and insular German superpower, not personal materialism. He was obsessed with being the greatest influential figure of human history, and being remembered centuries, “1,000 years” after his death. - This facet of his “reason of being” made him very different from his no. 2- Hermann Goering. Speer wrote in his memoirs that Hitler’s lifestyle resembled that of a prisoner. -was antisemitic but was not threatened and (in contrast to his political campaign) actually was marginally focused at the Jews- his primary concern was the Soviets. The Jews were actually the first of a long line of Eastern European races to be marginalized and eventually rendered extinct. (ie. his Generalplan OST ordered the immediate deaths of tens of millions by starvation) -They were first on the list because 1. they were most convenient thanks to prior mass political indoctrination 2. They had to be gathered first before they could effectively “hide and blend into” the population, because they were scattered all throughout Europe and often formed the Eastern European upper class.
akanska Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > ummm- so escobar never killed anyone?? I lived in > medellin. think about it. of course you example > was more extreme- but so much so that it puts > everyone in a state of mind that is not conducive > to reading comprehension. and if you want to be > REALLY extreme… killing all sorts of classes of > people was legal at some point in history, as were > slavery, and all sorts of other horrendous acts. > > (…there goes me trying to defend your argument > ever again) its not that i don’t appreciate you trying to defend my argument, its how do you draw the line. if you say hitler is too extreme, then i say escobar is too extreme, then joemasterT says murder is too extreme, then we’re debating whats bad enough to validate the point but not bad enough that people start a whole scene and start calling you racist. IHIHM, are you going to call akanska racist for mentioning escobar, he’s not white you know. mentioning a non-anglosaxon murderer is racist! i’d rather hit homeruns than bunt my whole life.
Only 1 voice of reason in this thread. "I’m surprised this thread goes on and on (almost goes over 6 pages) just to satisfy a troll. Wake up people, he’s just wagging your tail. Don’t let him. "
juxtapositioner Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > needhelp Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > We need someone to come in here and threaten to > > report this forum to CFAI, so we can all bond > once > > again. > > > If I remember correctly Aliman has Tranniemadrid > on his facebook. “She” may be an ideal candidate > to take a new name, return, and liven up the forum > until becoming banned once again. Can you inform > “her” Aliman? She’s not too pleased with the name calling. Can we drop it and change the subject, please?
^why dont s/he come here and tell us to back off. eh? eh?