^ I am not sure we can agree on the word hypocrisy in this context. Most of us are fine with women having healthy sex lives, we were discussing where people drew lines with respect to conscious decisions that people took which is fair.
Now, if you argue that peoples past decisions need not be reflective of who they are today that would also be fair, however with a pool that is relatively large and you are not filtering out on uncontrollable factors like height or in the USA because you all still seem to be so hung up on it - race, perhaps it makes sense to invest time in finding someone more compatible.
I suspect a corollary would be some women flat out refusing to date men who have done hookers.
There are always degrees to what anyone’s willing to accept. bchad and BS seem to be willing to accept quite a lot in a possible partner. Where do you draw the line though? I’m really just curious. Let’s start with bestiality. Let’s say you find out a girl you’ve been dating for a couple months and have slept with admits she’s been intimate with her dog (not just peanut butter licking…full mounting). Scenario A) she did it several times in her less experienced days but has no desire to do it again; B) she liked it and is still interested in doing it.
See, to me, I see GB’s or a MMF as potential positives for a slightly more open relationship. So it’s less about what I’ll put up with and more about my own preferences.
It’s a case by case basis. This line of thread hacking started with MMF, which, given that a FFM is an occasional part of my fantasy repertory (not as often as you’d think, but it’s there), seems like something I can overlook fairly easily, the biggest problem perhaps being envy.
I guess you know the limits when you see it. Presumably there are degrees here: A) stuff you can compartmentalize fairly easily, B) stuff you can compartmentalize if you know it was a one time experimental thing that there isn’t much desire to repeat, and C) stuff you truly can’t get over (perhaps pedophilia or something like that).
That was just me being understated, but I can imagine a few (very few) situations where it might not matter. Was it a 17 year old boy who consented, or a 10 year old boy who didn’t (and legally couldn’t). How old was she at the time also matters.
So it also depends, but it’s much more likely to be a disqualifier than a run-of-the-mill MMF.
Is it fair to require a lower number than your own? Numbers well into the 40s for women in their thirties is far from uncommon. Some men are becoming a little delusional. There’s a lot of humping going on. Better join the party…
Haha, I feel like if most girls are telling you <5, they may not be being honest. From what I understand talking to girls, the overwhelming majority don’t include one night stands when they quote their history.
You should think of it as “how many per year?” So, if you’re dating a 35 year old and assume she began when she was 18, then a number in the mid-30s isn’t that bad. I mean, figure she banged a lot in college and then slept with 2 guys a year after that an she’s easily topped 40.
On a different note, to those guys out there in their 30’s (or older) still playing the field with numbers solidly in the triple digits…You’ve slept with a transsexual. Tucker Max did the math and once you’ve hit >150 women, you’ve almost certainly slept with a person that was born a man.
We covered this before. All women are getting laid. They’re humping the 8, 9, and 10s. They’re leaving most of you out. How do you know? You’re not getting laid.