Is your score distribution way sh*ttier than you thought it would be?

Morning: <50 in 6 out of 11

>50, <70 in 4 out of 11

>70 in 1 out of 11

Afternoon: <50 in 2 out of 8

>50, <70 in 4 out of 8

>70 in 2 out of 8

And I passed?

edit: I was very confident that I passed this exam afterward too

would you say you are now demonstrating “over-confidence” now??

Tch tch cth, some more education is clearly needed.

Confidence is about the future, my untiring and selfless efforts were in the past (except this present post.) So “no.”

Please read all my previous posts, write them on a blackboard and memorize them, so you are not led to ask elementary questions like this.

True but the guys who earn charter by squeaking by or take 10 years are probably shittier analysts in real life relative to the studs. On paper someone might not know the difference but eventually you get called out.

Good that you pointed it out.

So if you are not confident you are then bragging, which is a worse personality trait to have in my opinion.

I don’t know how to put it in English, but how do you describe a person when he’s educating people when it’s not asked for?

in English its called a “douchebag”

Ad hominem attacks serve no one. However, if you want to call me names, you are free to do so.

Overconfident, bragging, dispensing wisdom unasked, anything you like. I don’t mind, really.

I am too noble and selfless to respond in kind. It is my gift and my curse.

EDIT: andytrader called me a douchebag, not you (NANA). I don’t want to put words in your mouth, again, a noble and praiseworthy trait if you ask me.

1recho:

actually it wasnt directed at you. I did not read this thread it just appears to be going off on tangent. So dont take offense. I was generically describing “know-it-alls” who preach without solicitaiton.

^ no problem.

At one point this thread was about level 3 distribution, I think.

I can’t believe I read that entire arguement lol

Thanks for not putting things in my mouth :slight_smile:

but i think i agree with Andytrader in this case.

interesting…

I am deeply hurt, I don’t know if I can go on.

As they say, no good deed goes unpunished.

Don’t be too hurt, i judge people on case by case basis. I may disagree with you on some but agree with you on others.

^ You call people “douchebags” on a case-by-case basis based on who agrees or disagrees with you? That makes less sense than conflating luck with accuracy of predictions.

Sounds like another free lesson is in order…

Some people can be “douchebags” in some situations and be an angel in others.

Just like some people are great friends but make really bad boyfriends.

And yes, i categorize people as douchebags or not according to my perceptions, that’s what people do, there is no universal way of objectively naming someone as a douchebag.

Yes, I understand people can behave differently in different situations. My point was, douchebaggery is not determined by whether someone agrees or disagrees with you, it is determined by how they express their agreement or disagreement.

Hypothetical example: I say “I had a bad experience with this one Asian girl.” TRH says “me too, all Asian girls suck!” He is being a douchebag even though he is agreeing with me. And similarly, someone can disagree with you and be unfailingly polite and considerate of your feelings, so he is not a douchebag.

You are welcome.

ouch

I never said “Asian girls suck.” I love asian girls. While I don’t mind being called a douchebag, I’m really starting to wonder if you’re one too, 1recho.

TRH, that was a hypothetical example. It’s not a real example.

While I don’t mind being called a douchebag either, at least do it when I am actually being one.