and now we know you’re immediately on the defense on this subject. i wrote “i guarantee you white folks”, meaning “i guarantee you… white folks…” and you think i’m a non-white attacking whites. get off your high horse whitey. disclosure, i guarantee you i’m whiter than you.
ghibli i mean this in the nicest way possible but stop polluting this thread with your junk. no one cares and you sound more foolish with each passing post.
1. a person who believes that a particular race is superior to another.
None of your examples claim superiority, but they are accurate.
As he said, some illegal Mexican immigrants are rapist.
We had a moratorium on most immigration for thirty years during the 1900s in order to allow for assimilation. Current law calls for priority to be given to Christians. Nothing racist about a temporary moratorium on Muslims.
Mr. Con is an immigration lawyer specifically concentrated on getting Muslims into the country. He disappeared as quickly as he appeared because of evidence of sexism.Trump was right.
We have been told for years that white jurists can be biased against minority defendants. The reverse can’t be true?
The debate commission acknowledged his mic was faulty.
I don’t thinks Jews or blacks will dispute who is on average better with money. I won’t dispute who has bigger penises either. Well documented.
Obama’s own book’s promotional material in 1991 claimed he was born in Kenya. Yeah, silly someone would run with it. Not sure why that would imply someone believes one race is superior to another anyway.
in everyday language the word racist is more often than not used as a proxy for prejudiced and bigoted. this is why you get people saying that people are racist towards muslims which conveys the same meaning even though muslims are not a race.
second, if you make a blanket statement about 36 million people saying that they are rapists and criminals without further elaboration or empirical evidence to back up your claim and you do it in an offensive and non-tactful manner you don’t get points for telling it as it is, you get called out as a racist shithead.
third jurists have inherent bias in them, this has been documented by peer reviewed scientific studies. he questioned a fucking judge, if you go after one you better have some shit to back your claim rather than a hypothesis that he could be biased because of his race.
finally, i would just like to say that we have all swallowed the media bias and only you the and the other bloke on here can see trump for what he is. a poor well meaning guy who loves all people and is being slandered by everyone. either way, we won’t come around to your way of thinking so again stop polluting this thread with your crap or create another one where we have the option of ignoring it.